xJ4cks

House Resolution 939, "Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States for high crimes and misdemeanors", was tabled on December 11th, 2025. The same author of the bill to impeach the criminal chief executive in September, Representative Al Green (D), presented this bill for a floor vote.

The motion to table (kick to the curb) this bill passed. Seventy three of Green's own party members sided with Republican Reps to help table this bill, and avoid impeaching Donald Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors. Three did not vote. Forty seven voted "Present" in a gesture that telegraphed their inability to take a firm stand for or against the bill-- this of course helped defeat the bill.

Twenty three Dems were courageous enough to vote YEA and openly side with the GOP in defending Trump from a much-deserved impeachment.

The 23 Dem YEAs​

Cherfilus-McCormick Costa Crow Cuellar Davids (KS) Davis (NC) Figures Golden (ME) Gonzalez, V. Goodlander Gottheimer Gray Larsen (WA) Lee (NV) McDonald Rivet Panetta Perez Riley (NY) Scholten Schrier Stanton Suozzi Vindman

The 47 Dems who were "Present"​

Aguilar Bell Bera Beyer Bynum Case Casten Castor (FL) Clark (MA) Conaway Courtney DeLauro DelBene Fields Foster Frankel, Lois Himes Horsford Houlahan Hoyer Jeffries Kaptur Landsman Latimer Levin Lieu McBath McClellan McCollum Meeks Morelle Moskowitz Mrvan Pallone Pappas Pelosi Peters Pou Schneider Sewell Soto Subramanyam Sykes Tran Veasey Walkinshaw Whitesides

The Dems who didn't Vote on HR 939​

Gillen Nadler Swalwell

Takeaways​

Some faceless authors on Bluesky claim that it's good strategy for the Dems to NOT pursue an impeachment while they're the minority party and cannot take steps to remove Trump from office even if they impeach him. They argue that it's bad optics for the Dems to bring failed actions into the public eye, as this will hurt their chances in the next election.

I feel this is rubbish. First off, there is no guarantee that we will see another election. We have witnessed a wholesale criminal attack on our government's norms and our social fabric in 2025. Any reluctance to make official complaints about this is madness, and is reputational cancer for these Dems.

While impeachment is a statement of criticism and does not remove the impeached official from government, it is essential to demonstrate to the American people that the so-called oppostion party is actually opposed to: kidnappings, deportations, and murders by ICE; naked grift, patronage, and blackmail by the President; the dismantling of our healthcare, education, and government service by various unelected officials.

Dems who are siding with the GOP who have enabled this are committing a grievous error, and tarnishing their entire party's image by refusing to fight tooth and nail against this very openly criminal regime. They are either overconfident fools, or they are quietly aligned with Trump's outrageous actions.

Once again Representative Al Green (D) of Texas filed articles of impeachment against Trump, which entered the congressional record as House Resolution 939. The vote roll is here and it shows how 23 Democratic Representatives votes YEA to table this motion; 47 voted "Present" in an act of cowardly support of Trump's lawlessness. This motion was tabled (dropped from further consideration) by a majority of the House, with many of Green's own party once again voting not to impeach the lawless chief executive.

The Democratic Representatives who have voted to approve Trump's criminally underqualified nominees for 11 months now are openly collaborating to aid his regime and buttress it agains the will of We The People. This will not stand.

Please contact your rep if they voted YEA to table House Resolution 939, and ask their office why they are declining to vote as a opposition party to the criminal and murderous regime in the White House.

Once again, it bears stating that if elected members of the federal government violate their oath to honor and uphold the laws of the country and its people, they are unfit to hold office. Colluding with a criminal regime is indefensible.

I'm a US veteran and a web developer.

I don't believe in an authoritarian approach to government, I don't support the current administration, and I am disappointed that the so-called opposition party is not putting up anything like a meaningful opposition to:

• the kidnappings of US citizens by our DHS
• the kidnapping of US citizens by vigilantes impersonating DHS
• the executive branch ignoring orders from the judicial branch
• the legislative branch enabling the executive branch to continually violate the law
• stochastic terrorism from the White House
• dismantling the social fabric of our country
• planned construction of massive prisons
• completely illegal grift from the chief executive
• 4 years of the chief executive conducting "foreign policy" while a private citizen

A functional opposition to the actions of this administration would look like what Mitch McConnell did when Obama was in the White House: stalling and shutting down key legislative functions to prevent the executive branch from accomplishing meaningful changes. The House of Representatives under minority leader Jeffries have attempted no such thing, even when several Republicans have expressed bipartisan cooperation in standing against the current administration.

As of late July, 2025, Minority Leader Jeffries seems to be slowly warming to this approach, with Dems filing multiple amendments to appropriations bills in several committees in an attempt to release the Epstein files. Speaker Johnson this week sent Congress on an early summer vacation to stall democratic actions such as these, and defend the POTUS and unknown other persons who will be incriminated as confidants of a human trafficker and child pimp when these files are released.

I hope you contact your Representative if they did not support the motion to impeach the chief executive for high crimes and misdemeanors on June 24th, 2025.

Website​

This website is under development and may eventually offer contact info directly on the roster pages. Thank you for reading, please share this widely to keep our citizenry informed. There is no telling when this serially criminal, rampaging administration that currently steers our exective branch will act to stifle online media.

I've chosen a cat wearing a tinfoil hat as my avatar for political engagement in 2025. This is mainly because I like cats, yet it's also a statement of how I feel while trying to create a sane narrative in this absolutely insane year.

Social​

Find me on Bluesky if you wish, and stay savvy!

Democratic Authoritarians​

When Representative Al Green (D) of Texas filed a House Resolution to impeach Donald Trump for declaring war without consulting the 119th Congress 128 Democratic members of the US House of Representatives voted to table this motion.

These elected officials do not represent the citizens of the USA, they represent their own interests and those of their donors.

Last Name	State	Vote
Aguilar	California	Yea
Amo	Rhode Island	Yea
Auchincloss	Massachusetts	Yea
Beatty	Ohio	Not Voting

On June 22nd, 2025, US President Donald Trump ordered the nation's military to bomb Iran. This was an unlawful act by the US executive branch that was unconstitutional and clear grounds for impeachment by the legislative branch.

Two days later Representative Al Green (D) of Texas filed articles of impeachment against Trump, which entered the congressional record as House Resolution 537. This motion was tabled (dropped from further consideration) by a majority of the House, with many of Green's own party voting not to impeach the lawless chief executive.

This website is a record of their actions, and a small step towards holding the US House of Representatives accountable. These public servants are in thrall to an authoritarian version of the US government which has never been seen before in the 250 years of our nation's history.

Please contact your rep if they voted YEA to table this, and ask their office why they did not make even a symbolic gesture in protest of this illegal act of war. Some declined to vote at all.

If elected members of the federal government violate their oath to honor and uphold the laws of the country and its people, they are unfit to hold office.

Voted No to the Transfer of Power​

In the early hours of January 7th, 2021, House Congressional Republicans supported an objection against certifying the electoral college results. They voted no to following the rule of law and ceremonially ratifying the transfer of executive power to the incoming president.

This was the first time in over 240 years of the American experiment that the House of Representatives failed to unanimously endorse the electoral college results and acknowledge the new president.

It is notable that the US Capitol was stormed by violent rioters for over three hours only the day before, in an attempt to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power from outgoing President Donald Trump, who famously declined to summon law enforcement or a military response during these riots and instead watched the rioters attack Capitol police and invade the facilities with fascination.

Just hours after this historic assault, these 121 Representatives chose to disrespect the established laws and protocols of our nation, and honored the wishes of the violent mob when they cast their votes. Numerous legal scholars have called their votes an act of insurrection. Here are their names and states-- every one a registered Republican.

Aderholt, (R) Ala.; Allen, (R) Ga.; Arrington, (R) Texas; Babin, (R) Texas; Baird, (R) Ind.; Banks, (R) Ind.; Bergman, (R) Mich.; Bice, (R) Okla.; Biggs, (R) Ariz.; Bishop, (R) N.C.; Boebert, (R) Colo.; Bost, (R) III.; Brooks, (R) Ala.; Budd, (R) N.C.; Burchett, (R) Tenn.; Burgess, (R) Texas; Calvert, (R) Calif.; Cammack, (R) Fla.; Carl, (R) Ala.; Carter, (R) Ga.; Carter, (R) Texas; Cawthorn, (R) N.C.; Cline, (R) Va.; Cloud, (R) Texas; Clyde, (R) Ga.; Cole, (R) Okla.; Crawford, (R) Ark.; Davidson, (R) Ohio; DesJarlais, (R) Tenn.; Diaz-Balart, (R) Fla.; Donalds, (R) Fla.; Duncan, (R) S.C.; Dunn, (R) Fla.; Estes, (R) Kan.; Fallon, (R) Texas; Fischbach, (R) Minn.; Fitzgerald, (R) Wis.; Fleischmann, (R) Tenn.; Franklin, C. Scott, (R) Fla.; Fulcher, (R) Idaho; Gaetz, (R) Fla.; Garcia, (R) Calif.; Gibbs, (R) Ohio; Gimenez, (R) Fla.; Gohmert, (R) Texas; Good, (R) Va.; Gooden, (R) Texas; Gosar, (R) Ariz.; Graves, (R) Mo.; Green, (R) Tenn.; Greene, (R) Ga.; Griffith, (R) Va.; Guest, (R) Miss.; Hagedorn, (R) Minn.; Harris, (R) Md.; Harshbarger, (R) Tenn.; Hartzler, (R) Mo.; Hern, (R) Okla.; Herrell, (R) N.M.; Hice, (R) Ga.; Higgins, (R) La.; Hudson, (R) N.C.; Issa, (R) Calif.; Jackson, (R) Texas; Jacobs, (R) N.Y.; Johnson, (R), La.; Johnson, (R) Ohio; Jordan, (R) Ohio; Joyce, (R) Pa.; Kelly, (R) Miss.; Kelly, (R) Pa.; LaMalfa, (R) Calif.; Lamborn, (R) Colo.; LaTurner, (R) Kan.; Lesko, (R) Ariz.; Long, (R) Mo.; Loudermilk, (R) Ga.; Lucas, (R) Okla.; McCarthy, (R) Calif.; McClain, (R) Mich.; Miller, (R) III.; Miller, (R) W. Va.; Moore, (R) Ala.; Mullin, (R) Okla.; Nehls, (R) Texas; Norman, (R) S.C.; Nunes, (R) Calif.; Obernolte, (R) Calif.; Palazzo, (R) Miss.; Palmer, (R) Ala.; Perry, (R) Pa.; Pfluger, (R) Texas; Posey, (R) Fla.; Reschenthaler, (R) Pa.; Rice, (R), S.C.; Rogers, (R) Ala.; Rogers, (R) Ky.; Rose, (R) Tenn.; Rosendale, (R) Mont.; Rouzer, (R) N.C.; Rutherford, (R) Fla.; Scalise, (R) La.; Sessions, (R) Texas; Smith, (R) Mo.; Smith, (R) Neb.; Steube, (R) Fla.; Tiffany, (R) Wis.; Timmons, (R) S.C.; Van Drew, (R) N.J.; Walberg, (R) Mich.; Walorski, (R) Ind.; Weber, (R) Texas; Webster, (R) Fla.; Williams (R), Texas; Wilson, (R) S.C.; Wright, (R) Texas; Luetkemeyer, (R) Mo.; Malliotakis, (R) N.Y.; Zeldin, (R) N.Y.; Mann, (R) Kan.; Mast, (R) Fla.

Who Sponsored this Objection?​

Regarding the Senate, this objection was created and brought to the floor by Josh Hawley (R) of Missouri. He was photographed hours earlier outside the Capitol complex pumping his fist in the air and for all appearances encouraging the violent mob; he was one of 6 Senators who voted against following the rule of law.

Here are the other five Senators, all Republicans, who voted in favor of disregarding the electoral college results:

• Ted Cruz (Texas)
• Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.)
• Roger Marshall (Kan.)
• Tommy Tuberville (Ala.)
• John Kennedy (La.)

Outcome​

Many of the congresspeople who voted against transferring power on January 6th and 7th are still in office.

This is due to the refusal of Attorney General Merrick Garland to arrest and prosecute sitting members of Congress with insurrection and sedition. Garland stated publicly that doing so (fulfiling his job duties as the nation's chief law enforcement officer) would be needlessly political. He spent two years refusing to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate theft of classified documents by the former President, and roundly failed to protect the institutions and citizens of the USA.

AP News provides a trenchant example of this AG's professional ethos with the quote “We must understand that there is a difference between what we can do — and what we should do”.

Garland has faced no professional nor personal penalties for his actions or lack thereof. The President who appointed him, and who was the target of the congressional objection described above, defended him numerous times and is believed to have operated under diminished mental faculties for his entire term of office.

Sources​

• Politico
• US Archives
• AP News